Similar Stories 🔰

CBSE Class 12 Re-Evaluation Portal Opens Live: Class 12 re-evaluation and verification window will open today, June 1, 2026. Follow the blog for latest updates on window link, how to apply and more. | India News

CBSE Class 12 Re-Evaluation Portal Opens Live: On May 29, the board said its post-result portal for verification and re-evaluation of answer sheets will now become operational from June 1, 2026.

Rahul Gandhi and several students, including Vedant, spoke about the criticism they faced after raising concerns about the OSM system.

A massive data breach has exposed the answer sheets of two million CBSE Grade 12 students. The Congress party leader Jairam Ramesh has highlighted this incident, calling it a monumental lapse in student privacy. Concerns are raised about the company awarded the contract and the quality of scanning. This development follows previous allegations of mismanagement in the CBSE's Class 12 exams.

While adults debated and institutions defended themselves, three young boys showed remarkable courage in standing up for what they believed was right., Opinion - India, Times Now

The CBSE's OSM system is facing criticism due to unresolved issues identified during its pilot testing in Delhi., Education, Times Now

Students seeking mark verification and re-evaluation continue to flag portal glitches, with many claiming they are unable to log in, access records or download answer books., Education, Times Now

CBSE has clarified that students can use any listed payment gateway for verification and re-evaluation applications. The update came as nearly 40,000 candidates had completed the process by 9:30 am and the board urged students to follow only official communication.

With CBSE results now out, students and families are once again facing the big question: what comes next? In a system where early certainty is often valued over self-discovery, many are expected to make life-shaping career choices--even though careers rarely follow a straight path.

A second report submitted by participants listed at least 36 technical, operational and evaluation concerns. It warned of risks such as "blind or superficial checking" and stressed that the platform "does not provide opportunities for evaluators to interact, deliberate or arrive at a consensus while allotting marks, which is essential for fair and standardized assessment".