Similar Stories 🔰

Maharashtra FDA Commissioner Tukaram Mundhe defended the state's crackdown on food establishments and licence suspensions. He said the drive targets threats to public health, even as businesses and the Bombay High Court raised concerns over enforcement.

BENGALURU: A division bench of the Karnataka High Court upheld the order passed by a single judge that had set aside acquisition of several acres of land for th

KOLKATA: The Calcutta High Court on Wednesday observed that an individual identified as a suspected foreigner has the burden of proving Indian citizenship and t

The Bombay High Court challenged the Maharashtra Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regarding its strict enforcement in a food safety case involving a Navi Mumbai hotel. , India News, Times Now

Kolkata: Calcutta High Court on Wednesday permitted police to continue investigation in a 2024 case filed against Binpur BJP MLA Pranat Tudu but barred cops from taking any coercive action without the court's approval till Oct 12.

MUMBAI: Bombay high court on Wednesday asked the State to inform whether all eating houses including canteens run by state, semi-state authorities were being inspected in the ongoing FDA drive to ensure commercial kitchens are hygienically compliant and directed that a fresh inspection be carried out at Mantralaya canteen.

No names, no evidence, no prima facie material - the Delhi High Court dismissed a plea seeking action against alleged illegal migrants in the capital., Delhi News, Times Now

The Calcutta High Court said documents such as Aadhaar card, PAN card, voter identity card, bank passbook and ancestral land records are not conclusive proof of Indian citizenship.

The Supreme Court has clarified that offences under Section 66 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 are bailable, holding that the Punjab and Haryana High Court erred in observing that the provision had not been defined as a bailable offence. The Court held that the nature of the offence under Section 66 must be determined by reading it together with Section 77B of the Information Technology Act, which specifically classifies certain offences under the Act as bailable.

The court observed that documents such as an Aadhaar card, PAN card, voter identity card, bank passbook and ancestral land records are not conclusive proof of Indian citizenship.